Haynes v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
88 F.3d 898 · 1996
Citation profile
69 federal appellate · 73 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 209 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Kendrick v. Penske Transportation Services, Inc. (2000), Parkins v. Civil Constructors of Illinois, Inc. (1998)
69 federal appellate · 73 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981A · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Tomka v. Seiler Corp. · Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc. · U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. AIC Security Investigations, Ltd. · Price v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 209 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen faced with an intra-circuit conflict, a panel should follow earlier, settled precedent over a subsequent deviation therefrom.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“published decision of one panel of this court constitutes binding circuit precedent constraining subsequent panels absent en banc reconsideration or a superseding contrary decision by the Supreme Court.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under Title VII, suits against individuals must proceed in their official capacity; individual capacity suits are inappropriate.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.