Torres-Estrada v. Cases’s Empirical Analysis
2023
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · United States v. Kubrick · Berkovitz v. United States · Rivera-Gomez v. de Castro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e review [the] district court's grant of [the] motion to dismiss de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.