White v. Taylor

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 20, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-02-20

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2004-02-20

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Billy White appeals the magistrate judge’s orders denying his motions for appointment of counsel in his suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See White v. Taylor, No. CA-02-385 (E.D.Va. Sept. 22, 2002; July 24, 2003; Aug. 20, 2003). We also deny White’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED

¶3 The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).