Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 FRD 244 - Al-Jundi v. Rockefeller

Al-Jundi v. Rockefeller’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
5
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently May 2013

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

1001980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Yungkau · Denis Rende v. Alfred S. Kay · 362 F. Supp. 1005 - Yonofsky v. Wernick · Staggers v. Otto Gerdau Co. · Boggs v. Dravo Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule [Rule 25(a)(1) ] carefully distinguishes between “parties” and “successors or representatives of deceased parties” and does not mention “deceased parties” themselves. I therefore interpret rule 25 as allowing a motion to substitute to be made either by the estate of the deceased party (presumably acting through counsel for the estate) or by any other party, but not by the deceased party herself or himself (acting through counsel).... Stewart in his statement of death described himself as the attorney for the deceased party (and not for other parties) and now disclaims vigorously that he was and is not counsel to the estate. Under the interpretation just mentioned of Rule 25, these assertions render the statement of death filed by him a nullity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.