Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 F. Supp. 2d 1351 - Fouts v. Harris

88 F. Supp. 2d 1351 - Fouts v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
September 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Cleveland · United States v. Hays · Shaw v. Reno · United States v. City of Miami · Lawyer v. Department of Justice

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “two reapportionments within a short period of two years would greatly prejudice the [state] and its citizens by creating instability and dislocation in the electoral system and by imposing great financial and logistical burdens.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[s]uch old census figures have been recognized as unduly prejudicial because they fail to provide a basis for 'fair and accurate representation to the citizens.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.