88 F. Supp. 2d 222 - German v. Pena’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 718 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 7703
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · McPherson v. Coombe · Cohen v. Koenig · Williams v. Department of Army · Jackson National Life Insurance v. Merrill Lynch & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n election to proceed [with an EEO action] is indicated only by the filing of a written complaint; use of the pre-complaint process ... does not constitute an election for purposes of this section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Economou v. Caldera“whichever [the MSPB appeal or the EEO complaint] is filed first shall be considered an election to proceed in that forum”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Economou v. Caldera“[A] claimant must exhaust all available administrative remedies prior to bringing his action in the federal courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.