Ramos v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Houston v. Lack · Smith v. First Union National Bank · Ross v. Artuz · Terry Lynn Rhine v. Bobby Boone · Tony Bruce Bennett v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Here ... petitioner had no appellate remedies available to him under New York law with respect to his Section 440.10 motion once leave to appeal was denied ..Hence, unlike the situation in Bennett , any failure to serve petitioner with a copy of the order ... was immaterial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.