Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 Haw. 229 - Ringor v. State

Ringor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Moody v. Daggett · Black v. Romano · Richardson v. City and County of Honolulu

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[L]egislative enactments are presumptively valid and should be interpreted in such a manner as to give them effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.