Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 Haw. 404 - State v. Irvine

State v. Irvine’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2023

7 state decisions

301998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Knight · Grattafiori v. State · King v. Wholesale Produce Dealers Ass'n · State v. Ferreira · Mason v. Water Resources International

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “circumstances where . . . defense counsel has inexcusably or ineffectively failed to pursue a defendant's appeal from a criminal conviction in the first instance[.]”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]n criminal cases, [the Hawai'i Supreme Court has] made exceptions to the requirement that notices of appeal be timely filed.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “filed a motion for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal.5/ However, it appears that no such motion was filed, and there was no order entered by the District Court granting an extension of time to file the notice of appeal, pursuant to Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 4(b)(5). Rather, a notice of appeal initiating the present appeal was filed on July 1, 2019, more than 30 days after entry of the May 2, 2019 Judgment. The notice of appeal was therefore untimely. See HRAP Rule 4(b)(1).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.