State v. Snyder’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2019
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 53 Cal. 2d 455 - Petri Cleaners, Inc. v. Automotive Employees, Laundry Drivers & Helpers Local No. 88 · State Ex Rel. Lopez v. Killigrew · Commonwealth v. Fleckner · 4 Ill. 2d 38 - People v. Shambley · State v. Cohen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]fter the satisfaction of a judgment in a criminal case there is nothing on which a judgment of the appellate court can act effectively because there is nothing from which to appeal, and further proceedings are moot.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.