Asling v. Asling’s Empirical Analysis
1912
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1959
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Howell v. Howell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The plaintiff in an action for divorce must have been an actual resident in good faith of the state for one year next preceding the filing of the petition, and a resident of the county in which the action is brought at the time the petition is filed, unless the action is brought in the county where the defendant resides or may be summoned.” (Gen. Stat. 1915, § 7572, Civ. Code, § 664.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Long v. Long““The plaintiff in an action for divorce must have been an actual resident in good faith of, the state for one year next preceding the filing of the petition, and a resident of the county in which the action is brought at the time the petition is filed. (Gen. Stat. 1901, § 5133, Civ. Code, § 640.)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Long v. Long““The plaintiff may bring an action for divorce either in the county of his residence or in the county in which the defendant resides or may be summoned, but in any case the plaintiff must have been an actual resident in good faith of the state for one year before the filing of his petition.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Long v. Long
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.