¶1Appellants were adjudged to be guilty of contempt of court in violating an injunction restraining them from keeping and maintaining a nuisance in the Planter’s hotel, in the city of Wichita. The objection that leading questions were asked furnishes no ground for reversal, and the remaining one that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the judgment can not be upheld. ' Under the governing rule, the evidence appears to be ample.
¶2The judgment is affirmed.