Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 KAN 724 - State v. Price

State v. Price’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1929
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barkley v. State · Jennings v. State · Ingram v. State · McLaughlin v. State · Gay v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““By the provisions of the statute, a defendant, who has been convicted of a felony and appeals to the supreme court from such conviction, may be granted a stay of the sentence pending the preparation and hearing of the case on appeal upon a sufficient undertaking, given by others and not himself, upon the approval thereof by the proper officer of the state.” (Syl. If 1.) “Moreover, the provisions of section 154 of the criminal code fairly preclude the defenses pleaded to the action in this case. The signers of the bond are presumed to know the law, and when they individually signed the bond and delivered it to another to be delivered to the officer for acceptance, even if they had expected or had even agreed that the bond should not be valid until signed by others, if such bond came to the possession of an officer authorized to approve and accept it, and a defendant legally in custody, charged with a public offense, was discharged from custody by reason of the giving of the recognizance by which they undertook that the defendant should appear before a court or magistrate for examination or trial for such offense, they cannot be heard to dispute their obligation.” (p. 728.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.