Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 MDAPP 289 - Kenney v. State

Kenney v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1992
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Patton v. United States · United States v. Guerrero-Peralta · United States v. Ricks · 22 Md. App. 714 - Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““THE COURT: Okay. Wait a minute. We have a choice. He [the defendant] can either go with 11, or I am not going to ask this lady to come back on Monday under the circumstances. We can either declare a mistrial, stay tonight or go with 11. “[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: I would assume it would have to be stay tonight or go with the 11. I would have to ask my client if he would go with the 11, if that’s the alternative. “THE COURT: Why don’t you go down there and we will wait right now. “(The juror went back to the jury box.) “([Defense counsel] returned to the bench and the following ensued:) “[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Your Honor, could I ask the State’s Attorney if their intentions are to prosecute the case if it’s a mistrial? My client has advised me— “THE COURT: You know they aré going to prosecute him. “[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: My client has advised me that he does not want to interfere with this person’s surgery, and he will go with the 11. “THE COURT: He will go with the 11? Okay.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““(b) Number of Jurors.—A jury shall consist of 12 persons unless the parties stipulate at any time in writing or on the record that the jury shall consist of any number less than 12.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.