Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 Md. App. 343 - Paradiso v. Paradiso

88 Md. App. 343 - Paradiso v. Paradiso’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on James v. Prince George's County · Deering v. Deering · Harper v. Harper · 58 Md. App. 308 - Holston v. Holston · Schweizer v. Schweizer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “FL § 8-201(e)(2)(iv) is quite specific; it excludes from marital property any property acquired during the marriage that is directly traceable to a non-marital source. “Directly traceable” is not synonymous with “attributable.” ... This inability to trace property acquired during the marriage directly to a non-marital source simply means that all property so acquired was marital property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.