Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 NC 333 - Phifer v. . Barnhart

Phifer v. . Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 1974
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1974

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

301883189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . [T]he bargainee in an unregistered deed . . . [cannot] be displaced, or defeated, by the mere act of the bargainor in making another conveyance to a third party without notice, and whose deed may be registered. . . . “In Morris v. Ford, 2 Dev. Eq., 412 [ 17 N.C. 412 (1833) ], it is said, that such a bargainee, after the execution of his deed and before its registration, has not a mere equity in the land: he has an equity and an incomplete legal title, which will become a perfect legal title from the time of the execution of the deed, whenever the registration shall take effect.... “Again, in Walker v. Coltraine, 6 Ired. Eq., 79 [ 41 N. C. 79 (1849)], it was declared to be an error to say that an unregistered deed confers only an equity; that it is a legal conveyance, which, although it cannot be given in evidence until registered and therefore is not a perfect legal title, yet has an operation as a deed from its delivery; and it was emphatically said, that the ignorance of such a title in one, who might afterwards buy the land, could not impair it. “In Wilcox v. Sparks, 72 N.C., 208 [1875], Mr. Justice Reade, speaking for the court, says, that although a deed cannot be used to support a title until it is registered, still when registered it relates, and passes the title, as of the time of its execution....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.