Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 N.C. App. 347 - Burrow v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

88 N.C. App. 347 - Burrow v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2004 · most notably Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co. (1989), 184 W. Va. 700 - Powell v. WYOMING CABLEVISION. INC. (1991)

33 state decisions

210198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 79 N.C. App. 483 - Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co. · Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc. · 74 N.C. App. 331 - Sides v. Duke University · HOGAH v. Forsyth Country Club Co. · North Carolina National Bank v. Gillespie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The failure of an employer to employ, either in employment or at the employee’s previous level of employment, an employee who receives compensation for permanent total disability, or a permanent partial disability interfering with his ability to adequately perform work available, shall in no manner be deemed a violation of this section.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(c) Any employer shall have as an affirmative defense to this section the . . . failure to meet employer work standards not related to the Workers’ Compensation Claim ... (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.