Bailey v. Kling’s Empirical Analysis
1911
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1989
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bee Publishing Co. v. World Publishing Co. · Bee Publishing Co. v. Shields · Brooks v. Dutcher · Bloomfield v. Pinn · Herzog v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The contention scarcely merits consideration here, as the order appears to have been practically ignored during the progress of the trial. All that could reasonably have been shown under the averments as they stood before the order was made was presented by the evidence. ... By the instructions of the court the subject of the [stricken portions were] submitted to the jury. The error, if any, was cured, and no prejudice resulted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.