Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

88 N.H. 374

189 A 865

Salem v. Sperber

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 2, 1937

Supreme Court of New Hampshire · decided 1937-02-02

Relies on Cahoon v. Coe · Derry National Bank v. Griffin

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1937-02-02

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1997

4 state decisions

101937194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 The statute (P. L., c. 66, s. 25) requires the purchaser of real estate sold by a tax collector to give notice to mortgagees within thirty days from the sale, and the sale “shall be void as against any mortgagee to whom such notice” is not given. The requirement of notice within the time specified is a material condition “because the statute makes it so.” Derry Bank v. Griffin, 68 N. H. 183, 184. The principle that in all cases of sales of real estate for non-payment of taxes “every prerequisite to the exercise of the power must precede its exercise” (Cahoon v. Coe, 57 N. H. 556, 569) extends to matters to be performed in order that a sale include a mortgage interest, and the statutory regulations are fixed and rigid.

¶2 Decree for defendant.

Page, J., was absent.
/88/nh/374 · .json · Public domain