88 N.J. Super. 396 - State v. Tyler’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
4 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1985
4 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Oyler v. Boles · Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Chandler v. Warden Fretag · James Graham v. State of West Virginia · Public Service Commission v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As basic fairness requires that a multiple narcotics offender be afforded the same protection on sentencing as any other multiple offender convicted of a misdemeanor, it would follow logically that the accusation procedure outlined in A. J. S. 2A :85-13 should apply ordinarily, in the course of administering justice, to the sentencing of a second or third offender under the Narcotics Drug Act, A. J. S. A. 24:18-47 [at 402 ; emphasis added]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Bozeyowski
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.