State Ex Rel. Anaya v. McBride’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
78 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Ammerman v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. (1976), State v. Belanger (2009)
78 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. Delgado · State v. Roy · State v. Gunzelman · State v. Arnold · 68 Wash. 2d 553 - State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. Dubuque
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““‘Our constitutional power under N.M. Const. art[J III, § 1 and art. VI, § 3 of superintending control over all inferior courts carries with it the inherent power to regulate all pleading, practice and procedure affecting the judicial branch of government. ... “Under the Constitution, the legislature lacks the power to prescribe by statute rules of practice and procedure, although it has in the past attempted to do so. Certainly statutes purporting to regulate practice and procedure in the courts cannot be made binding, for this constitutional power is vested exclusively in this court.’ ” 89 N.M. at 311 , 551 P.2d at 1358 . (Citations omitted).”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage““No member of the legislature shall, during the term for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil office in the state, nor shall he within one year thereafter be appointed to any civil office created, or the emoluments of which were increased during such term____””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“One of the primary purposes of quo warranto is to ascertain whether one is constitutionally authorized to hold the office he claims, whether by election or appointment....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.