Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 N.M. 37 - State v. Self

State v. Self’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
2
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently March 2012 · most notably 1 N.M. Ct. App. 535 - State v. Tollardo (2012), State v. Day (1978)

66 state decisions

26019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tocco v. United States · State v. Turner · State v. Lopez · Chiordi v. Jernigan · State v. Gunthorpe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The danger of admitting hearsay into evidence is that it is not subject to the usual tests that can be applied to ascertain its truthfulness by cross-examination of the declarant. McCormick on Evidence, § 245 (2d ed. 1972). It is not given under oath nor is the declarant subject to • cross-examination or to the penalties of perjury. Chiordi v. Jernigan, 46 N.M. 396 , 192 P.2d 640 (1942). However, there are exceptions to the hearsay rule which ■ depend on circumstantial guarantees of reliability to substitute for the oath, cross-examination and penalties of perjury. Guarantees of reliability are and must be the key to open the door to the exceptions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the precise matter offered for its truth ought to be against the interest of the declarant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.