Telephonic, Inc. v. Rosenblum’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
12 district · 49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably Kloss v. Edward D. Jones & Co. (2002), Tercero v. ROMAN CATH. DIOCESE OF NORWICH (2002)
12 district · 49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba · National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Szukhent · Parke-Bernet Galleries, Inc. v. Franklyn · Gilbert v. Burnstine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“repeatedly equated the 'transaction of business'--insofar as the acquisition of long-arm jurisdiction is concerned--with the due process standard of 'minimum contacts' sufficient to satisfy”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Any person, whether or not a citizen or resident of this state, who in person or through an agent does any of the acts enumerated . . . thereby submits himself . . . to the jurisdiction of the courts of [New Mexico] as to any cause of action arising from: (1) the transaction of any business within this state . . . (3) the commission of a tortious act within the state."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'doing a series of similar acts for the purpose of thereby realizing pecuniary benefit, or otherwise accomplishing an object, or doing a single act for such purpose with the intention of thereby initiating a series of such acts.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.