State v. Bolen’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 1999
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Tanton · In re Allison · State v. Allen · State v. Klasner · 58 Cal. App. 257 - People v. Sichofsky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"If different articles are taken from different owners at different times, the defendant is guilty of separate larcenies. Accordingly, if on the same expedition there are several distinct larcenous takings, as taking the goods of one person at one place, and afterwards taking the goods of another person in another place, and so on, as many crimes are committed as there are several and distinct takings, and this is true although the thefts may all have been committed in rapid succession and in pursuance of a formed desiring to steal."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barker“"The facts show a taking from each cash register. The registers were in different locations; the money taken was the property of separate owners. The factual predicate for the doctrine (single larceny) is lacking because taking the money from two cash registers did not occur at the same time and place." [10]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barker“the stealing of property from different owners at the same time and at the same place constitutes but one larceny.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.