Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 Ohio App. 3d 158 - State v. Pinkerman

88 Ohio App. 3d 158 - State v. Pinkerman’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably State v. Hatton (2022), 101 Ohio App. 3d 752 - State v. Bradley (1995)

50 state decisions

3201993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Adams · State v. Xie · State v. Schiebel · State v. Moreland · 19 Ohio App. 3d 141 - State v. Walden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Motions for new trial on account of newly discovered evidence shall be filed within one hundred twenty days after the day upon which the verdict was rendered, or the decision of the court where trial by jury has been waived. If it is made to appear by clear and convincing proof that the defendant was unavoidably prevented from the discovery of the evidence upon which he must rely, such motion shall be filed within seven days from an order of the court finding that he was unavoidably prevented from discovering the evidence within the one hundred twenty day period.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A motion for new trial pursuant to Crim.R. 33(B) is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The term 'abuse of discretion' connotes more than an error of law or judgment; it implies that the court's attitude is unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.