88 Ohio App. 3d 177 - State v. Smidi’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2021
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Berger v. United States · Oregon v. Kennedy · 8 Ohio App. 3d 72 - Durst v. Van Gundy · 41 Ohio App. 3d 91 - State v. Daugherty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'It is improper for an attorney, under the pretext of putting a question to a witness, to put before the jury information that is not supported by the evidence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Parham
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.