88 Ohio App. 3d 296 - Dozer v. Dozer’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 district · 75 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably Gibson v. Gibson (In Re Gibson) (1998), 149 Ohio App. 3d 50 - Willis v. Willis (2002)
2 district · 75 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · Booth v. Booth · Berk v. Matthews · Long v. Calhoun · Gianakas v. Gianakas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A person guilty of any of the following acts may be punished as for a contempt: "(A) Disobedience of, or resistance to, a lawful writ, process, order, rule, judgment, or command of a court or an officer[.]””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When applying the abuse of discretion standard, a reviewing court is not free to merely substitute its judgment for that of the trial court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`connotes more than an error of law or judgment; it implies that the court's attitude is unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.