88 Ohio App. 3d 394 - State v. Ramos’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
120 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 120 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably 151 Ohio App. 3d 276 - State v. Hunter (2002), Wilburn v. Wilburn (2006)
120 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on MacHibroda v. United States · 54 Ohio St. 2d 440 - Beer v. Griffith · State v. Kapper · 42 Ohio St. 2d 46 - State v. Milanovich · State v. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 120 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Since only the Chief Justice or [the chief's] designee may hear disqualification matters, the Court of Appeals was without authority to pass upon disqualification or to void the judgment of the trial court upon that basis”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“"R.C. 2701.03 sets forth the procedure by which a party may seek disqualification. The statute requires the party seeking disqualification to file an affidavit of prejudice with the Ohio Supreme Court. This Court, therefore, has no jurisdiction to pass upon this issue[.]" State v. Ramos (1993), 88 Ohio App.3d 394 , 398 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[APPELLANT] RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL IN VIOLATION OF HIS RIGHTS UNDER THE SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND ARTICLE 1 , SECTION 10 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF OHIO[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.