Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 Ohio App. 3d 432 - Bailey v. Allberry

88 Ohio App. 3d 432 - Bailey v. Allberry’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably Zoppo v. Homestead Insurance (1994), 106 Ohio App. 3d 627 - Iames v. Murphy (1995)

56 state decisions

2201993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fantozzi v. Sandusky Cement Products Co. · Yungwirth v. McAvoy · 72 Ohio App. 3d 767 - Dillon v. Bundy · 74 Ohio App. 3d 246 - Jeanne v. Hawkes Hosp. of Mt. Carmel · 127 Ohio St. 564 - Fromson & Davis Co. v. Reider

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[I]n order to set aside a damage award as inadequate and against the manifest weight of the evidence, a reviewing court must determine that the verdict is so gross as to shock the sense of justice and fairness, cannot be reconciled with the undisputed evidence in the case, or is the result of an apparent failure by the jury to include all the elements of damage making up the plaintiff's claim.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is so disproportionate as to shock reasonable sensibilities and indicates that the jury lost its way in assessing compensatory damages.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “For example, compensatory damages may, among other allowable elements, encompass direct pecuniary loss, such as hospital and other medical expenses immediately resulting from the injury, or loss of time or money from the injury, loss due to the permanency of the injuries, disabilities or disfigurement, and physical and mental pain and suffering.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.