Kaffeman v. Maclin’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Cleary (2001), In re Disqualification of Winkler (2013)
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sangster v. Dunn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“denying affiants' seemingly reasonable requests to record objections ..., and subjectively characterizing testimony.... These actions cause me to conclude that Judge Cleary has demonstrated a fixed anticipatory judgment that requires her disqualification to avoid the appearance of impropriety and restore the absolute confidence of the parties in the fairness of these proceedings. 55 In re Disqualification of Cleary, 723 N.E.2d at 1107 (alteration in original) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). The Ohio Supreme Court's reference to Sutter's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a judge 'has an ethical obligation to conduct himself or herself in a courteous and dignified manner that does not convey the appearance of bias or prejudice toward litigants or their attorneys.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“assert[ed] [to the Ohio Supreme Court] that the judge twice found affiant Sutter in contempt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.