Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 OHIOST3D 208 - State v. Arnett

State v. Arnett’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

797
cited by 797 later decisions
3
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 788 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 797 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Kalish (2008), State v. Jones (Slip Opinion) (2020)

5 federal appellate · 788 state decisions

3190200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Witherspoon v. Illinois · Gardner v. Florida · Townsend v. Burke · State v. Mills · Barclay v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 797 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “use specific language or make specific findings on the record in order to evince the requisite consideration of the applicable seriousness and recidivism factors.”
    43 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “discretion to determine the most effective way to comply with the purposes and principles of sentencing,”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “catchall provision in R.C. 2929.12(A) also permits the sentencing judge to consider 'any other factors that are relevant to achieving those purposes and principles of sentencing.'”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.