Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 OHIOST3D 430 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably State v. Adams (Slip Opinion) (2015), State v. Brown (2003)

70 state decisions

330200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Weeks v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We are disinclined to impose greater restrictions in the absence of explicit state constitutional guarantees protecting against invasions of privacy that clearly transcend the Fourth Amendment. * * * It is our opinion that the reach of Section 14, Article I, of the Ohio Constitution * * * is coextensive with that of the Fourth Amendment.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[o]fficers may perform a full search of an arrestee's person regardless of the offense prompting the arrest.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “(1) The offender requires medical care or is unable to provide for his own safety. * * * {¶ 11} Furthermore, "[a]bsent one or more of the exceptions specified in R.C. 2935.26 , a full custodial arrest for a minor misdemeanor offense violates * * * Section 14 , Article I of the Ohio Constitution, and evidence obtained incident to such an arrest is subject to suppression in accordance with the exclusionary rule.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.