Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 Okla. 188 - Okmulgee Producing & Refining Co. v. Wolf

Okmulgee Producing & Refining Co. v. Wolf’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2024

18 state decisions

11019231930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Campbell v. Powell · Board of Com'rs of Alfalfa Co. v. Ferguson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Had counsel for the defendant in open court by oral consent waived a jury prior to such date, a journal entry thereof should have been entered, and, no such journal entry having been made, a journal entry made at the time the jury was demanded, in which the trial court recites that theretofore a jury had been waived by statement made in open court, is not sufficient to constitute a waiver .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.