majority"> BRETT, J.

It appearing that heretofore and on December 8, 1948, 88 Okla. Cr. 154, 200 P. 2d 781, this court rendered its opinion in the above styled and numbered matter, wherein it was ordered that the petitioner, Fred Custer, be remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Washita county, Oklahoma, pending rendition of judgment in accordance with the provisions of Title 68, O.S.A. 1941 §§ 417, 420. Said order was made and entered for the reason that in pronouncing judgment and sentence the aforesaid provisions of the statutes had not been followed and the petitioner had been sentenced to serve a term in the penitentiary one year in excess of the two years provided by law, and said judgment was therefore void.

It further appears that since the rendition of said opinion the authorities of Washita county have made no *162 effort to execute the order of this court for return of the said Fred Custer, the petitioner, for proper judgment and sentence, and the court is informed the said Washita county authorities do not desire to incur the expense incident to the procedure necessary for the pronouncement of a valid sentence; and it further appearing that in the early part of April, 1949, the petitioner -will have served the maximum of two years as provided by law, and having been prejudiced in his rights as to application for parole, because of said excessive sentence, is entitled to his immediate release under said writ of habeas corpus heretofore granted. The warden of the State Penitentiary should be and is hereby ordered and directed to release the said petitioner from his custody, subject of course to any holds that might be pending against him. Mandate forthwith.

Citation profile

Relationships

How this case has been treated — in progress