Weygandt v. Bartle’s Empirical Analysis
1918
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 1994
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hickory v. United States · Railway Co. v. Sweet · Bullard v. . Pearsall · Woods v. Wikstrom · White v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““All such declarations and exclamations of present pain or suffering as would ordinarily and probably be caused by such injury are admissible as original evidence when made under ordinary circumstances, although it be a considerable ■ time after the injury; declarations of past pain and suffering or such declarations when made after .the controversy has arisen or suit has. been brought are not:ordinarily admissible.” 13 Cyc. 200 (8)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Frangos v. Edmunds
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.