Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

88 Or. App. 185

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 28, 1987

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1987-10-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1991

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-10-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM

¶1 Defendant was convicted in a jury trial of robbery in the first degree. He did not testify at trial. He had requested Uniform Criminal Jury Instruction 10.14:

“A defendant has an absolute constitutional right not to testify. Therefore, a defendant’s decision not to testify cannot be considered as an indication of guilt. It should not be commented upon or in any way considered by you in your deliberation.”

¶2The trial court did not give that instruction. Defendant contends, and the state concedes, that the failure to give the requested instruction is reversible error. We agree. State v. Hale, 22 Or App 144, 145, 537 P2d 1173 (1975).1

¶3Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

¶4 Defense counsel did not except to the court’s failure to give the requested instruction. However, the request that the instruction be given preserves the question for review. State v. Ketchum, 66 Or App 52, 55 n 3, 673 P2d 555 (1983).

/88/orapp/185 · .json · Public domain