Bellikka v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1988
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A possessor of land who leases a part thereof and retains in his own control any other part which the lessee is entitled to use as appurtenant to the part leased to him, is subject to liability to his lessee and others lawfully upon the land with the consent of the lessee or a sublessee for physical harm caused by a dangerous condition upon that part of the land retained in the lessor's control, if the lessor by the exercise of reasonable care could have discovered the condition and the unreasonable risk involved therein and could have made the condition safe.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bellikka v. Green“A lessor of land who, by purporting to make repairs on the land while it is in the possession of his lessee, or by the negligent manner in which he makes such repairs has, as the lessee neither knows nor should know, made the land more dangerous for use or given it a deceptive appearance of safety, is subject to liability for physical harm caused by the condition to the lessee or to others upon the land with the consent of the lessee or sublessee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bellikka v. Green“the Supreme Court's recent `duty trilogy': Donaca v. Curry Co., 303 Or. 30 , 734 P.2d 1339 (1987); Kimbler v. Stillwell, 303 Or. 23 , 734 P.2d 1341 (1987); Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1J, [ supra 303 Or. 1 , 734 P.2d 1326 (1987)].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bellikka v. Green
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.