Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 S.D. 369 - State v. Martinez

State v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 2006 · most notably State v. Kaseman (1978), State v. Olson (1987)

34 state decisions

2001974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 2 Cal. 2d 527 - People v. Miller · State v. Larkin · State v. Norman · State v. Judge · State v. Klein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he line between preparation and attempt is drawn at that point where the accused's acts no longer strike the jury as being equivocal but unequivocally demonstrate that a crime is about to be committed.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]o consummate an attempt to commit a crime there must be something more than mere intention or preparation. The attempt must be manifested by acts which would end in accomplishment, but for intervening circumstances occurring apart from, and independent of, the will of the defendant.... In other words, to constitute an attempt the acts of the defendant must go so far that they would result in the accomplishment of the crime unless frustrated by extraneous circumstances.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Any person who attempts to commit a crime and in the attempt does any act toward the commission of the crime, but fails or is prevented or intercepted in the perpetration thereof, is punishable”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.