Sanchez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 875 So. 2d 780 - Bolden v. State · 613 So. 2d 569 - Brown v. State · 585 So. 2d 1079 - Coon v. State · 630 So. 2d 660 - Stone v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hether the seized property belonged to Sanchez and whether it was being withheld for prosecutorial purposes. Even though the property was removed from a vehicle that did not belong to Sanchez, he should have been afforded an evidentiary hearing to ensure that he does not, in fact, have a possessory interest in those items. After the hearing, the trial court can then invoke its power to determine whether there is a valid basis to return the property to Sanchez.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.