¶1Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722, 722-23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding “section 89.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional,” and rejecting Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289, 1308 (M.D.Fla.2011), in which federal court held section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2004), “violates the due process clause and that the statute is unconstitutional on its face”); Ortega v. State, 76 So.3d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); see also State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).
88 So. 3d 430
Alvarez v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 16, 2012
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2012-05-16
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2012
1 state decisions
Relies on Santiago v. State · Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections · 77 So. 3d 722 - Little v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2012-05-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →