Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 TC 63 - Melvin v. Commissioner

Melvin v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
June 2013
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably Taube v. Commissioner (1987), Levy v. Commissioner (1988)

9 federal appellate ·

3501987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Abramson v. Commissioner · Challenge Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner · Loftin & Woodard, Inc. v. United States · American Properties, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · American Properties, Inc. v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the business, even as to the equity capital which he has contributed to the extent he is protected against economic loss of all or part of such capital by reason of an agreement or arrangement for compensation or reimbursement to him of any loss which he may suffer. Under this concept, an investor is not”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(4) Exception. — Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a taxpayer shall not be considered at risk with respect to amounts protected against loss through nonrecourse financing, guarantees, stop loss agreements, or other similar arrangements.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(2) Borrowed amounts. — For purposes of this section, a taxpayer shall be considered at risk with respect to amounts borrowed for use in an activity to the extent that he— (A) is personally liable for the repayment of such amounts, or (B) has pledged property, other than property used in such activity, as security for such borrowed amount (to the extent of the net fair market value of the taxpayer’s interest in such property). No property shall be taken into account as security if such property is directly or indirectly financed by indebtedness which is secured by property described in paragraph (1).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.