Huff v. Crawford’s Empirical Analysis
1895
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 1992 · most notably Watts v. McCloud (1918), Larry George Sales Company v. Cool Attic Corporation D (1979)
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lynch v. Alex. Ortleib & Co. · Lagow v. Neilson · Hunton v. Nichols · Morrell v. Ingle · Wright v. Strauss & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The plaintiffs had failed to show that Brush was a resident of the state, or that he was within the state at the time he toolc possession by Ms tenants of tlie property in suit. * * * If Brush was a nonresident and absent irons the state at the time the cause of action accrued against him, his absence was not to be accounted against him'.” (Italics mine.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Graham v. Englemann““If the defendants were residents of the state, or were within the state at the time the adverse possession was talcsn by their agent, tho statute would apply.” (Italics mine.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Graham v. Englemann
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.