Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 Tex. 653 - Wright v. John T. Hardie & Co.

Wright v. John T. Hardie & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

71 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently June 2007 · most notably Nelson v. Krusen (1984), Prouty v. Musquiz (1900)

71 state decisions

170189519001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Legislature may provide a shorter period of limitation for existing causes of action. It may make a statute of limitation for causes when none existed before. But it can not, by so abbreviating the time in which suit must be brought, take away the right of action altogether. It must allow a reasonable time after the law goes into effect to bring suit upon actions which are not then barred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.