Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 U.S. 123 - Watson v. Bondurant

Watson v. Bondurant’s Empirical Analysis

88 U.S. 123 · 1874

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 1978
most recently cited

1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1978

1 district · 5 state decisions

4018741880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grosholz v. Newman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““He” (the mortgage creditor) “can proceed to enforce his mortgage directly against his-mortgage debtor without reference to the transferee of that debtor. But still the transferee is subrogated to his vendor’s rights, by virtue of the purchase, and has sufficient interest in the object of the contract of mortgage to sue to annul the sale if the forms of law have not been complied with by the mortgage creditor or his vendor in making the forced sale.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In such a case as the present the importance of actual seizure is obvious. The defendant was no party to the action brought on the mortgage. He knew nothing about it. Had his lot been seized by the sheriff, as it ought to have been, his attention would have been called to it. The seizure would have been notice. He could then have protected himself.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.