Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 U.S. 205 - Littlefield v. Perry

Littlefield v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis

88 U.S. 205 · 1874

Citation profile

358
cited by 358 later decisions
39
cited 39 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

117 federal appellate · 37 district · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 358 later decisions (39 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2012 · most notably Waterman v. Mackenzie (1891), Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. (1926)

117 federal appellate · 37 district · 31 state decisions — followed in 10 states

520187418801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moffitt v. Garr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 358 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “.“An action which raises a question of infringement is an action arising ‘under the law,’ and one who has the right to sue for infringement may sue in the Circuit Court. Such a suit may involve the construction of the contract as well as the patent, hut that will not oust the court of its jurisdiction.””
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The decree is, as we think, too broad. . . . The order is to account for all profits received from the manufacture, etc., of stoves embracing the improvements covered by any of the patents. This would cover all the profits made upon a stove having in it any one of the improvements patented. The true inquiry is as to the profits which the defendants have realized as the consequence of the improper use of these improvements. Such profits belong to the plaintiff, and should be accounted for to him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The contest is now between an assignor in equity and his assignee. A court of equity will in such a case give the same legal effect to an equitable title that it would to one that was legal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.