Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 U.S. 350 - Mitchell v. United States

Mitchell v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

88 U.S. 350 · 1874

Citation profile

323
cited by 323 later decisions
15
cited 15 times by the Supreme Court
22
states following
June 2026
most recently cited

85 federal appellate · 54 district · 66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 323 later decisions (15 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2026 · most notably State of Texas v. State of Florida (1939), Margaret Williamson v. Katherine Osenton (1914)

85 federal appellate · 54 district · 66 state decisions — followed in 22 states

4201874188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 323 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] domicile once acquired is presumed to continue until it is shown to have been changed.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Among the circumstances usually relied upon to establish the animus manendi are declarations of the party, the exercise of political rights, the payment of personal taxes, a house of residence, and a place of business.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'[a] residence at a particular place accompanied with positive or presumptive proof of an intention to remain there for an unlimited time.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.