Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 U.S. 41 - Vannevar v. Bryant

Vannevar v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis

88 U.S. 41 · 1874

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
23
cited 23 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
February 1939
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions (23 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1939 · most notably Ayers v. Watson (1885), Graves v. Corbin (1890)

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

3701874188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Doane v. Glenn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““And where a suit is now pending, or may be hereafter brought, in any state court, in which there is a controversy between a citizen of the state in which the suit is brought and a citizen of another state, any defendant, being such citizen of another state, may remove such suit into the Circuit Court of the United States for the proper district””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “at any time before the final hearing or • trial of the suit”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““In Insurance Co. v. Dunn [ 19 Wall. 214 , 22 L. Ed. 68 ] it was held that after a motion for a new trial had been granted, a removal might be had. But after one trial, the right to a second must be perfected before a demand for the transfer can be properly made. Every trial of a cause is final until in some form it has been vacated. Causes cannot fie removed to the circuit court for a review of the action of the state court, hut only for trial. The circuit court cannot, after one trial in a state court, determine whether there shall be another. That is for the state court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.