Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 Utah 535 - Van Cott v. Turner

Van Cott v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1983
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1983

3 state decisions

10193619401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bankers' Trust Co. v. District Court of Weber County · Sammis v. Marks, Judge · State ex rel. Carrigan v. Bowman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A writ of prohibition will lie only in cases of manifest necessity and after a fruitless application for relief to the inferior tribunal.” (Italics added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.