Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 Wash. 2d 127 - State v. Smith

88 Wash. 2d 127 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
6
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

90 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 95 Wash. 2d 143 - State v. Houser (1980), State v. O'NEILL (2003)

90 state decisions

29019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Carroll v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`emergent or exigent circumstances regarding the security and acquisition of incriminating evidence'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “confronted by emergencies and exigencies which do not permit reasonable time and delay for a judicial officer to evaluate and act upon probable cause applications for warrants by police officers.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “It is fundamental that the doctrine which recognizes the validity of a third party's consent to a search must be applied guardedly to prevent erosion of the protection of the Fourth Amendment, since it makes no requirement of the existence of probable cause for the search and does not constitute an exception based on necessity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.