Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 Wash. App. 423 - State v. Haack

88 Wash. App. 423 - State v. Haack’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2019

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

160199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Shepard v. United States · 115 Wash. 2d 60 - State v. Camarillo · State v. Hoffman · United States v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““To convict a Defendant of the crime of Murder in the First Degree, each of the following elements of the crime must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt: “(1) That on or about the 27th day of August, 1986, the Defendant shot Louis A. Millard; “(2) That the Defendant acted with intent to cause the death of Louis A. Millard; “(3) That the intent to cause the death was premeditated; “(4) That Louis A. Millard died as a result of Defendant’s acts; and “(5) That the acts occurred in Okanogan County, Washington.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A conviction based on split elements may be affirmed '[s]o long as the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt to the satisfaction of all of the jurors that at least one of the participants [had the requisite intent] and at least one but not necessarily that same participant [committed the criminal act].'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.